Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mohd Ubais Ansari"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Insights of Green Electronics and Sustainable Design -Legal Framework to promote Green Electronics
    (The Lawgical junction and MJS Publishing House, 2025) Mohd Ubais Ansari
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The United Nations and Displacement in Armed conflicts: Mandates and Challenges
    (The Lawgical junction and MJS Publishing House, 2025) Mohd Ubais Ansari
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Unconscious Actions and Criminal Liability: Rethinking Mens Rea in Light of Modern Neuroscience
    (River Book Publication, 2025) Mohd Ubais Ansari
    The intersection of neuroscience and criminal law challenges traditional notions of mens rea and criminal responsibility, particularly in cases involving unconscious actions or impaired mental states. While Indian jurisprudence emphasizes intentionality through actus reus and mens rea, it struggles to accommodate conditions like automatism, epilepsy, or trauma-induced dissociation. Section 84 of the IPC (now section 22 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) offers limited protection, often excluding non- psychotic disorders and placing undue burden on the accused. Judicial inconsistencies further complicate adjudication, as seen in cases of sleepwalking or neurological impairments. This chapter emphasize on cautious integration of neuroscientific insights to refine legal frameworks, balancing accountability with diminished culpability. Reforms must expand definitions of unsoundness of mind, distinguish automatism from insanity, and incorporate expert testimony while preserving core legal principles.

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify